Skip to main content

Early Black Friday Deal: your first three months from $59. Ends December 1. See the deal

3cubed.ai Research, August 2026

National Hospice Brand AI Visibility Study

Nationally recognized. Absent where referrals are decided.

3cubed.ai Research Team

105
physician questions

105 measured questions across 16 seed topics.

10 of 10
named questions

Every question that named the Brand produced a confirmed mention.

84 of 86
referral questions missed

The Brand was absent from 84 of 86 local referral questions (97.7%).

94%
absent at decision

16 of 17 Decision-stage questions did not mention the Brand.

12
confirmed mentions

10 of the 12 came from questions that named the Brand.

The headline finding

Across 105 physician-focused AI questions, a nationally recognized hospice brand (blinded here as "the Brand") shows two very different profiles. Nationally, AI knows it: all 10 questions that named the Brand produced a confirmed mention, and the Brand surfaced as a national leader in comprehensive palliative care. Locally, where a physician asks how to choose a hospice for a patient, the Brand all but disappears. Across 86 questions on after-hours response, emergency coverage, family support, care coordination, quality ratings, the referral process and physician reputation, it was absent from 84 (97.7%).

Study design

This Findabl Prompt Fanout analysis examines how often a nationally recognized U.S. hospice brand appears across the physician hospice journey. The brand's identity has been blinded: it is referred to throughout as "the Brand," and questions that named it show "[Brand]" in place of the name. The study includes 105 unique measured questions across 16 seed topics, grouped into three layers: questions that name the Brand, questions about national hospice leadership, and the local referral measures physicians weigh when choosing a hospice for a specific patient. Of the 105 answers, 12 were confirmed Brand mentions, 2 partial, 3 unclear and 88 had no Brand mention.

National recognition vs. local referral measures

The Brand performs very differently depending on how close the question is to an actual referral. When the Brand is named, or when the question is about national hospice leadership, AI has something to say about it. When a physician asks the practical questions that decide where a patient is referred, AI answers without it.

Brand coverage by question type
Question typeMeasuredPresentPartialUnclearAbsent
Questions naming the Brand1010000
National-leadership questions91134
Local referral-measure questions8611084

This is not a finding about the Brand's care quality or its local operations. It is a finding about whether AI connects a nationally known name to the point-of-referral questions physicians actually ask.

Where the Brand appeared

The Brand received 12 confirmed mentions. Ten came from questions that named it, covering pain and symptom management, its palliative care model, physician referral experience, physician involvement after referral, care coordination, responsiveness and communication, and support for patients who want to stay comfortable at home. Only two confirmed mentions came from questions that did not name the Brand: one national-leadership question, and one comparison of how hospice providers differ in 24/7 physician referral support. The Brand is reliably recognized when prompted by name, but rarely introduced by AI when the physician leaves the choice open.

Across the physician journey

The local referral gap persists across the journey and is most pronounced at Evaluation and Decision, the stages closest to an actual referral. Validation looks stronger, but 4 of its 18 questions named the Brand. The single Post-referral question named the Brand and is too small a sample to read as a benchmark.

Brand coverage by buyer stage
StageMeasuredPresentPartialUnclearAbsentAbsence rate
Discovery181111583%
Evaluation363003392%
Comparison152111173%
Validation184011372%
Decision171001694%
Post-referral110000%

Where the Brand is missing: local referral measures

These are the practical questions a physician asks when choosing a hospice for a patient: how fast the team responds after hours, what happens in an overnight emergency, how families are supported, how care is coordinated with the referring team, where to check quality ratings, and whether the referral will reflect well on the physician. Across 86 such questions, the Brand was confirmed present once and partially present once.

Brand coverage by local referral measure
Referral measureMeasuredPresentPartialUnclearAbsentAbsence rate
After-hours response time90009100%
After-hours emergency coverage70007100%
Family support70007100%
Care coordination70007100%
Physician reputation60006100%
Official quality ratings60006100%
Referral process (weeks to live)60006100%
Provider evaluation criteria2400024100%
24/7 referral access6100583%
Oncology partnership6010583%
Other unbranded referral questions20002100%
All local referral measures861108498%

National leadership: recognized, but not consistently

The seed question "Which is the best hospice brand in the United States?" produced nine measured variations: 1 present, 1 partial, 3 unclear and 4 absent. The Brand surfaced when AI was asked which national hospice brands offer the most comprehensive palliative care programs, and was described as the strongest all-around starting point for national hospice scale. In the partial result, AI named the Brand as a large national operator but steered the physician toward local Medicare-certified quality and caregiver-experience data. The study does not support saying AI never recognizes the Brand as a national leader, nor that the Brand consistently owns that position.

What this means

  • National recognition is an asset: AI can answer questions about the Brand when it is named, and places it among national hospice leaders.
  • The larger opportunity is connecting the Brand to the unbranded questions physicians ask about a specific patient: after-hours response, emergency coverage, family support, care coordination, quality and physician trust.
  • AI answered patient-level questions by pointing to local Medicare-certified quality data and caregiver-experience ratings, so independent, location-level sources matter more than owned national content.
  • Decision-stage absence is 94%. The questions asked immediately before a referral are the highest-value place to start.

Methodology and limits

  • The analysis uses only saved, measured answers from Findabl Prompt Fanout. All 105 questions were observed.
  • Present means the Brand appeared with a confirmed, grounded mention. Partial means limited or incomplete grounding. Absent means the answer did not mention the Brand. Unclear means an answer exists but the saved evidence does not support a definitive classification.
  • This is an AI visibility study. It does not measure care quality, patient outcomes, physician preference, referral volume, market share or commercial performance.
  • Buyer stage is an organizational label and should not be read as measured conversion or funnel progression.
  • The provider's identity has been blinded. Results and counts are unchanged from the original study.
  • The local referral questions did not name a geography, so the study shows the national-to-local gap at the level of referral decisions, not market by market.

Run this measurement for your brand

Findabl tracks your buyer questions across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini, maps the source domains shaping the answer, and turns missed citations into actions.

Check my AI citations

Read the June study

AI Recommendation Stability